The breadbox American as a Rambler sports car!

20 february 2020 -- the ideas in here all came true -- please see Rambler Roadster pages for lots of detail and photos of how this turned out. Better than imagined, by far!

20 february 2020 -- some of the stuff on this page is now kinda dumb -- I considered deleting it to save myself the embarrassment. I was dead wrong about the T96+OD 'never right gear' -- it was very nicely geared for all around use, as it turned otu. The problem is/was that the T96 is weak and slow. I broke it, twice. There's a nice T5z from Modern Drive Lines in there now. RTFM Roadster.

This page will incrementally document changes to my 63 "breadbox" American to make it handle well (OK better). It's off to a good start just from reasonable chassis design, luckily.

First off, the front suspension of this car is mechanically perfect (with a few exceptions, below). Clearly, no car will handle or behave well with excess wear and bad parts. Unfortunately, the suspension has inherent problems, but they're totally dealable. No worn-out car will handle well.

When I ran the 2009 SoCal TT the car was essentially dead stock, with the exception of oversized and drilled drum brakes and fat tires (BFG Radial T/As, 400 wear rated), both twice the original size.

Drilled drum brakes are as good as small discs. Emphasis on small. I can say that with good authority now. I don't engine-brake this car; with low compression and the spectacularly slow (and weak...) T-96 transmission it's a waste of time. The drums did all the work. If I did nothing else, I worked the hell out of these brakes. Zero fade. They work.

The biggest inherent limitations are horsepower and the transmission. It's never in the right gear, a good trans will help on the street and maybe even mileage, and more power behind this old T-96 is asking for failure. The Borg Warner T-5 transmission is the swap of choice and though this chassis is fraught with potential problems that's what I am/was persuing here. However, it's a deeply invasive hack job, and I just can't bring myself to remove the Twin Stick feature of this car, so for the near term the powertrain will remain stock other than the fuel injection.

Chassis setup for handling

Conventional wisdom for American "performance" car setup generally states: heavy fron sway bar, stiff springs, stiff shocks, and a host of other "no-brainer" decisions. But I suspect this unquestioned wisdom is utterly wrong for spirited driving on severely twisty canyon roads with rough surfaces. Actual mountain roads are not a smooth road-race track and this sure isn't a drag-stip car. This chassis is not set up with 60's/70's brutal "safety' understeer and it sure isn't a long and heavy tuna boat. The things that seemed like liabilities on this car turned out to be assets. They just need improvement.

100" wheelbase, true double-wishbone front suspension, 2500 lb. curb weight, large (6" or more) suspension travel. Decently low unsprung front weight. True unibody construction. These are assets indeed!

What follows is The Plan, and will change randomly with time. These are essentially notes to myself.